Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, y) → h(x, y)
f(x, y) → h(y, x)
h(x, x) → x
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, y) → h(x, y)
f(x, y) → h(y, x)
h(x, x) → x
Q is empty.
Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, y) → H(y, x)
F(x, y) → H(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, y) → h(x, y)
f(x, y) → h(y, x)
h(x, x) → x
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ EdgeDeletionProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, y) → H(y, x)
F(x, y) → H(x, y)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, y) → h(x, y)
f(x, y) → h(y, x)
h(x, x) → x
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ EdgeDeletionProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, y) → H(x, y)
F(x, y) → H(y, x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, y) → h(x, y)
f(x, y) → h(y, x)
h(x, x) → x
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.